Search for: "Lymer" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2009, 10:25 am
Those of you who have been reading The Amateur Law Professor for a while remember the lymeric ruling out of the Western District of Washington. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Vexatious litigant orders should only be made when other procedural techniques would be inadequate and the offensive conduct is persistent: Lymer v Johnson, 2020 ABCA 167 at para 85. [21] If vexatious litigant orders are to be made, the restrictions should be focussed on the particular litigant, proportional to the problematic conduct and no wider than is necessary: Lymer v Johnson at para 85. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Jonsson v Lymer, 2020 ABCA 167 (CanLII) [38] While some may disagree with the need for “persistence”, that is the standard that has been selected by the Legislature. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Lymer v Jonsson, 2016 ABCA 76 [16] Read in this way, the effect of s 192(3) is to limit the Registrar’s power to sanction for ex facie contempt so as to reserve to the superior court the power to imprison. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Tican has an absolute right to self-represent (Lymer), he does not have those privileges in relation to the litigation of others. [read post]